HOTS dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini: Analisis Kebutuhan dan Implikasi

Authors

  • Febritesna Nuraini Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Puguh Wahyu Prasetyo Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Santo Mugi Prayitno Dinas Pendidikan Pemuda dan Olahraga Kota Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Zamzani Zainudin Flinders University, Australia
  • Hardika Hermawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Junita Dwi Wardhani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Putri Sabrina Uswatun Hasanah Ahmad Dahlan University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v9i4.6876

Keywords:

Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi, Pengembangan Ide, Mahasiswa PGPAUD, Pembelajaran Kreatif, Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

Abstract

HOTS memungkinkan anak mengembangkan pola pikir analitis dan kreatif, yang menjadi dasar bagi pemecahan masalah. Namun, banyak mahasiswa calon guru PAUD mengalami kesulitan dalam menerapkan HOTS dalam pembelajaran, disebabkan oleh kurangnya pemahaman terhadap strategi pengajaran eksploratif dan keterbatasan pengalaman dalam merancang aktivitas bermain berbasis HOTS. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan pembelajaran HOTS dalam bermain matematika bagi mahasiswa calon guru PAUD serta mengidentifikasi strategi efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif, melibatkan 50 mahasiswa PGPAUD yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa mengalami kesulitan dalam mengembangkan ide kreatif, terutama dalam tugas individu yang membutuhkan pemikiran tingkat tinggi. Strategi pembelajaran berbasis proyek, seperti Problem-Based Learning dan flipped classroom, terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan HOTS mahasiswa. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap peningkatan kualitas pendidikan guru PAUD dengan menawarkan pendekatan inovatif yang lebih efektif dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, A. (2022). Menyongsong era digital kesiapan guru dalam teknologi informasi dalam pendidikan anak usia dini. Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development, 2(4), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v2i4.68

Akuba, S. F., Purnamasari, D., & Firdaus, R. (2020). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran, efikasi diri dan kemampuan memecahkan masalah terhadap penguasaan konsep matematika. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.2827

Artika, L. Y., Uyun, M., & Isnaini, M. (2023). Keterampilan berpikir kreatif melalui project based learning. Raudhah Proud To Be Professionals: Jurnal Tarbiyah Islamiyah, 8(1), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.48094/raudhah.v8i1.291

Babchuk, W. A. (2017). Book review: Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, by S. B. Merriam & E. J. Tisdell. SAGE Publications.

Banks, B., Borghi, A. M., Fargier, R., Fini, C., Jonauskaite, D., Mazzuca, C., Montalti, M., Villani, C., & Woodin, G. (2023). Consensus paper: Current perspectives on abstract concepts and future research directions. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100531

Daryanes, F., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2025). Building students’ research skills in environmental science courses with research team-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15893

Davis, C. P., Altmann, G. T. M., & Yee, E. (2020). Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(1–2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1710124

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Hizqiyah, I. Y. N., Nugraha, I., Cartono, C., Ibrahim, Y., Nurlaelah, I., Yanti, M., & Nuraeni, S. (2023). The project-based learning model and its contribution to life skills in biology learning: A systematic literature network analysis. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i1.22089

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Islamovna, K. G., & Normamatovna, H. N. (2025). Enhancing students’ creative thinking through international studies assignments. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 38, 217–221.

Komalasari, S., Hermina, C., Muhaimin, A., Alarabi, M. A., Apriliadi, M. R., Rabbani, N. P. R., & Mokodompit, N. J. D. (2022). Prinsip character of a leader pada generasi Z. Philanthropy: Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.26623/philanthropy.v6i1.4960

Kuh, G. D. (2021). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(3), 131–137.

Kurniawan, M., & Setyaningtyas, E. W. (2025). The implementation of critical and creative thinking in research-based learning for sustainable language education. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e02185. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe02185

Leuwol, N. V., Wula, P., Purba, B., Marzuki, I., Brata, D. P. N., Efendi, M., Masrul, M., Sahri, S., Ahdiyat, M., & Sari, I. N. (2020). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia perguruan tinggi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x

Meilita, I. M., Asbari, M., & Timur, L. S. (2023). Pendidikan melalui permainan: Membangun kreativitas dan inovasi pada generasi digital. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 2(5), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v2i5.629

Mumford, M. D., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., & Mecca, J. (2023a). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies and knowledge. In Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 249–264). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1037/13117-003

Mumford, M. D., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., & Mecca, J. (2023b). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies and knowledge. In Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 249–264). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mursid, R., Saragih, A. H., & Hartono, R. (2022). The effect of the blended project-based learning model and creative thinking ability on engineering students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(1), 218–235.

Muslimin, T. P., & Fatimah, A. A. B. (2024). Kompetensi dan kesiapan guru sekolah dasar terhadap tantangan pendidikan di era Society 5.0. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 55–72.

Rodarte-Rodríguez, A., Becerra-Sánchez, A., De La Rosa-Vargas, J. I., Escalante-García, N. I., Olvera-González, J. E., Velásquez-Martínez, E. de J., & Zepeda-Valles, G. (2023). Speaker identification in noisy environments for forensic purposes. In J. Mejia, M. Muñoz, Á. Rocha, & V. Hernández-Nava (Eds.), New perspectives in software engineering (pp. 299–312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36009-3_24

Rohimat, S. (2021). Analisis keefektifan pembelajaran kimia secara daring di SMA Negeri 6 Kota Serang pada masa pandemi Covid-19. EDUPROXIMA (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA), 3(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.29100/eduproxima.v3i2.2088

Romdona, S., Junista, S. S., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Teknik pengumpulan data: Observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner. JISOSEPOL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik, 3(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.61787/taceee75

Strobel, J., & Van Barneveld, A. (2019). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046

Stukalina, Y. (2022). Addressing service quality issues in higher education: The educational environment evaluation from the students’ perspective. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.658099

Velásquez-Martínez, E. de J., Becerra-Sánchez, A., José, I., González-Ramírez, E., Rodarte-Rodríguez, A., Zepeda-Valles, G., Escalante-García, N. I., & Olvera-González, J. E. (2023). Combining deep learning with domain adaptation and filtering techniques for speech recognition in noisy environments. 2023 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC58757.2023.10409492

Villani, C., Loia, A., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2024). The semantic content of concrete, abstract, specific, and generic concepts. Language and Cognition, 16(4), 867–894.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Wahyudi, A. (2020). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kreatif calon guru kimia pada perkuliahan biokimia. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(2), 99–110.

Zainuddin, Z., Hermawan, H. D., Nuraini, F., Prayitno, S. M., & Probowasito, T. (2019). Flipping the classroom with a LMS: Designing a technology-based learning model. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i3.12886

Downloads

Published

01-05-2025

Check Article Index

How to Cite

Nuraini, F., Prasetyo, P. W., Prayitno, S. M., Zainudin, Z., Hermawan, H., Wardhani, J. D., & Hasanah, P. S. U. (2025). HOTS dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini: Analisis Kebutuhan dan Implikasi. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(4), 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v9i4.6876

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Hasanah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).